Comments on: Jason Bourne Vs James Bond – Who’d Win?

By: Mike Myles

Mike Myles — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:43:42 +0000

Jason Bourne hands down and hears why. First off, Jason Bourne is not a spy, he’s an assassin, trained to kill. James Bond, is a spy, trained to gather information and defend himself if required. Second, James Bond usually fights dumb henchmen who usually end up getting the better of him. For the most part, he just gets lucky (with the exception of the Daniel Craig films where he does kick some ass). Jason Bourne takes on Assassins who are trained the same as himself. He also doesn’t have to think about what his next move is or use fancy gadgets to get the job done. He just reacts, and grabs the first thing he can find such as a newspaper, a pen, or a towel and “WHIPS THE SHIT” out of whoever he’s fighting. And thirdly, Bond is just a martini drinking, womanizing, tuxedo wearing pretty bot. Bourne is a programmed machine who can apply first aid on himself while evading the CIA and the Russian secret service.

CONCLUSION: JAMES BOND CAN KISS BOURNES ASS

By: luke l

luke l — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:59:22 +0000

i think bourne would win because he is a more of a fighter than lover. but i am very keen on bond mmmmmmmmmmmm…………………………………………………………..BOURNE WOULD WIN!!!!!

By: Deathmastertx

Deathmastertx — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:02:07 +0000

Bourne would win. Bond is a spy. Bourne is an assassin. Bond only wins because of stupid villains who don’t kill him and tell him their plans. Bond has got gadgets and an Aston-Martin. Bourne has a mini. Not exactly fair is it? But Bourne still manages to get away from heaps of police. Bourne has survived police, the CIA and several trained assassins. Borne would beat Bond in 20 seconds in pure hand to hand fighting. Bond may be good at shooting but Bourne is better. Bourne once shot an assassin between the eyes while falling through the middle of several stories of stairs. In all Bourne would win, there is no question about it.

By: Matt Ruane

Matt Ruane — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:54:00 +0000

Bond for sure if Bourne tryed to Fight Sean Connery’s or George Lazenby’s Bond he May just win. But if went up against Pierce Brosnan’s Bond He’ll end up a bloody mess Roger Moore’s Bond he’ll be crying for Marie Daniel Craig’s Bond tied in a not or with his arms ripped of or Timothy Dalton the great Man of both The Bonds and all actors Bourne end up skinned alive and hanging from a hook in a slaughter house

By: power_switch

power_switch — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:12:32 +0000

Bourne would smoke Bond. a much more ferrocious and inventive character and seemingly better trained. Bond gets beaten regularly in his movies, he just wins when the bad guy does classic evil overlord blunders. Bourne only gets caught when it serves his purposes.

By: Mario

Mario — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:09:22 +0000

Bond is very unreal, Bourne is as real as it gets.

By: nevin

nevin — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:06:53 +0000

007 is lic. to kill.i think the name james bond and jason bourne are the same there both lic to kill. matt damon is the best person for the next 007.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:48:16 +0000

Roger Moore era Bond would win with a lethal combination of deadly eyebrow raising and wooden acting.

By: JGM

JGM — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:47:03 +0000

no, Bourne would rip Jaws’s teeth out and kill him with them

By: dij

dij — Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:40:26 +0000

You cant beat Bond, i think 21 films have proven that.

You need to rate these people by who they beat and why they do it, 1. Borne? 3 films and one organisation, Why?, because he has to / revenge. 2. Bond 21 films and 20 organisations, Why?, for fun / for kicks.

I’d like to see Borne take on Jaws, Jaws would rip his head off.