Comments on: Automated SEO Reciprocal Link Requests

By: Ghosts

Ghosts — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:09:26 +0000

I’m intrigued by this. How on earth does somebody manage to fake PR. I wouldn’t have thought it was possible, otherwise what’s the point of it? I get how they have bought a PR7 sites to use, before it drops off. But faking one!

By: Jalaj

Jalaj — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:30:33 +0000

I didn’t get the difference between valid and fake PR… both the homepage and links page are showing PR7 on Google toolbar… do you mean to say Toolbar display can be modified?… I think this page used to have some value on old site and the person now holding it is exploting all such pages.

By: Sebastian

Sebastian — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:05:26 +0000

I received this email too. I realised it must’ve been an expired domain. Although the home page has a valid PR7, this page http://www.scienceonstage.net/top-hits.html has a fake PR.

By: Jon Dunn

Jon Dunn — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:38:38 +0000

This type of spam infuriates me. Not only do they ask you to link to crap, but they expect you to place the link first then they will reciprocate even though they are the ones spamming for link exchanges. To be honest link exchanging holds little link value and one way inbound links are much better to focus your efforts on.

By: Jalaj

Jalaj — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:16:21 +0000

The person got a Dropped PR7 domain… I think that is not possible without a bot… I too like “<- fixed”

By: Rodney Edwards

Rodney Edwards — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:57:15 +0000

Keep hitting the idiots with sticks Mathew!
Oh, and link me too.

By: Ben Tremblay

Ben Tremblay — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:52:09 +0000

This made me laff out loud.

This truly did make me laugh out loud. <=- fixed

keep the faith
^5

–bentrem

haaaaaaaaaahahaha!